Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sander Arends vs Laurynas Grigelis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Arends vs Grigelis analysis and find out who is favored!
Sander Arends vs Laurynas Grigelis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Arends 0 - 0 Grigelis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Arends has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Grigelis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Arends, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Grigelis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Arends has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Grigelis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Arends has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Grigelis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Arends has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 42/ 25), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 28/ 29). Grigelis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 181/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Arends has played against opponents with an average rank of while Grigelis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Arends has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Grigelis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Arends has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Grigelis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
884
Rank
183
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
57% (96-71)
Career Total W/L
60% (477-312)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$36,285
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Sander Arends vs Laurynas Grigelis For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Arends VS Grigelis
Sportsbook
Offer
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sander Arends | Laurynas Grigelis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sander Arends Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Marvin Moeller
Player
Sander Arends
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Sander Arends
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sander Arends
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
86%
(
66 of
77)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
75
|
0-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Sander Arends
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jan Satral
Player
Sander Arends
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikola Cacic
Player
Sander Arends
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
12
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gianni Mina
Player
Sander Arends
73%
(
72 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
46 of
95)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sander Arends
Player
Kevin Krawietz
47%
(
43 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Sander Arends
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
7
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
10
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
25 of
28)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Sander Arends
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Laurynas Grigelis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Omar Giacalone
Player
Laurynas Grigelis
71%
(
75 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laurynas Grigelis
Player
Arthur Bouquier
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laurynas Grigelis
Player
Louis Tessa
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
14
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gilbert Klier Junior
Player
Laurynas Grigelis
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laurynas Grigelis
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jean Thirouin
Player
Laurynas Grigelis
61%
(
72 of
119)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
40%
(
19 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Laurynas Grigelis
Player
Daniel Michalski
60%
(
73 of
122)
1st Serve %
72%
(
99 of
138)
18
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
62 of
99)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
39%
(
48 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
58 of
138)
132
Total Points Won
128
|
5-7 7-5 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Laurynas Grigelis
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
61 of
80)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laurynas Grigelis
Player
Matias Franco Descotte
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Arends Vs Grigelis Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Arends are available here and Grigelis photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
